[Previous Category] [Catalog] [Order Info]
Angora goats and the mohair they produce are not major agricultural products in the United States and certainly not in Minnesota where there are fewer than 3,000 Angora goats. Flocks are small and often are owned by those interested in hand weaving. Nevertheless, mohair finds a ready market. In 1989, raw mohair prices in Texas were: kid hair (it's much finer), $6.50/lb; yearling hair, $2.00/lb; and adult hair, $1.00/lb. In addition, mohair incentive payments have amounted to $30 to $15 per head the past two years. These high hair prices are stimulating interest in goat production among an increasing number of Midwest livestock producers.
The United States (primarily Texas) produces about 10.0 million lb; South Africa, 15.0 million lb; and Turkey (original home) 16.0 million lb of mohair, clean basis. The United Kingdom takes 62 percent, France 9 percent, and Italy 9 percent of U.S. exports. Japan, Russia, and Western European countries are also big importers of mohair. Australia has recently imported some superior Angora breeding stock from Texas in an effort to improve the hair quality of its goats and stimulate production.
Angora goat production data applicable for the Midwest are scarce, and research from the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (TAES) deals more with adult goals maintained under extensive grazing conditions. Data are lacking as to their husbandry requirements, reproductive potentials when kept under intensive conditions, and housing requirements. At one time, it was believed that Angora goats could not withstand cold weather. However, over 10,000 goals are kept in Upper Michigan, and Minnesota producers manage them much like sheep.
Figure 1. High prices for mohair have stimulated interest in Angora goat production.
Both male and female goats are seasonal breeders. The male commences rutting in the fall and is largely responsible for initiating estrus in the does. Well-grown-out doe kids reach puberty at 6 to 8 months, but usually fewer than 50 percent conceive. Hair production is reduced if does kid their first year.
The estrus cycle is 19 to 21 days long, and does remain in estrus for 24 to 36 hours (Texas). Gestation is 148 to 150 days.
Ovulation rate is significantly affected by condition and weight of the doe at breeding. Ovulation rate at first estrus is significantly lower than at subsequent estrus. In a study at TAES, does weighing 90 pounds or more usually produced twins. Does weighing 60 pounds or less produced no twins, and a very high percent did not ovulate.
Fetal weight accelerates after about 80 days and increases about .1 lb/day during the last two weeks. At birth, single males average 6.5 lbs; single females, 6.0 lbs; twin males, 6.0 lbs; and twin females, 5.5 lbs, with a range in birth weight from 4.5 to 7.5 lbs. Dystocia (difficult birth) among goats is rare.
Factors responsible for low reproduction efficiency in Angora does include: failure to ovulate or show estrus, 10-12%; not conceiving, 10-12%; conceiving but failing to kid (embryo loss), 8-9%; and kidding but failing to raise the kid, 18-22% (TAES).
Mohair is the product sold, and inherited traits affect the amount, uniformity, fineness of grade, and lustre of the fleece. Under the same environment and feed circumstances, the amount of hair produced per goat annually can vary 6 to 8 pounds due to superior breeding. The official score card used in evaluating goats gives equal value to body traits and to fleece traits. Fleece traits seemingly warrant 60 percent of the emphasis.
During the last ten years, several hundred Angora flocks have been established in the Midwest. However, only some 25 flocks of those are good sources of breeding stock.
When buying breeding stock to upgrade and enhance the productivity of your flock, establish minimum goals. Select bucks (billies) as yearlings with good size and conformation with fleece production records for the first two shearings. Select bucks from the top 20 percent of the crop that have sheared a minimum of 12 pounds in the two kid clips. In the fall, yearling does should weigh about 60 pounds and should have sheared a minimum of 10 pounds of hair in the first two kid clips. Try to develop a flock that will produce 16 to 20 pounds of hair annually rather than 10 to 14 pounds.
Recognize that while big Angora goats produce more kids and more hair, their hair is usually coarser, and is less valuable per pound. In the last 2 or 3 years, coarse hair has been in less demand. Therefore, a flock improvement program that includes the use of bucks with finer hair (micron of 35 to 38 rather than 42 to 45) may be in order.
Figure 2. Growth pattern and daily feed intake of drylot-fed Angora kids.
Table 1. Nutrient requirements and typical rations for angora goats
| Body wt., lbs. |
Daily wt. change, lbs |
TDN, lb | Protein, lb |
Ca,g | P,g | Vit. A, 1000's I.U. |
Amt. diet to feed daily, lb |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance, summer dry period, early gestation | either | |||||||
| alf. hay |
2:1 hay-corn |
|||||||
| 85-90 (15 lbs hair/year) |
0.0 to .05 | 1.40 | .20 | 3 | 2 | 1.2 | 2.80 | 2.30 |
| Late gestation, last 4-6 weeks | ||||||||
| alf. hay |
2:1 hay-corn |
|||||||
| 85-90 | .10 to .20 | 1.80 | .35 | 5 | 3 | 2.0 | 3.60 | 3.00 |
| Lactation | ||||||||
| 2:1 hay-corn |
1:1 hay-corn |
|||||||
| 85-90 (one kid) |
0 to -.05 | 2.20 | .40 | 6 | 4 | 4.0 | 3.70 | 3.40 |
| 85-90 (twin kids) |
-.05 | 2.50 | .45 | 6 | 4 | 4.0 | 4.20 | 3.80 |
| Kidsa | ||||||||
| 1:2 hay: corn-SBM |
1:3 hay: corn-SBM |
|||||||
| 20-30 | .10 | .70 | .15 | 1.00 | .97 | |||
| 20-30 | .20 | .90 | .20 | 1.30 | 1.25 | |||
aResearch at the University of Minnesota indicates that weaned kids grain-fed in drylot do not eat this much feed or gain .20 lb daily. The kid grain diet should contain a minimum of 15% protein (20% SBM and 80% corn) plus alfalfa hay. During gestation, and particularly late gestation, feed intakes of 3.5 to 3.8 lb/doe daily (4.0% of their body weight) are difficult to achieve. Goats, when fed excess alfalfa hay, invariably refuse to eat all the leaves. This reduces nutrient intake below what was intended.
Angora goat producers should obtain the best sources of nutrition information possible. The nutrient requirement data presented in table 1 are a modification of the nutrient requirements for goats suggested by the National Research Council (NRC) 1981. The NRC publication is the best compilation of data available but may not be specific for Angora goats under Midwest conditions; however, producers should use it to best determine how to feed their goats. Angora goats seemingly prefer high-quality grass hay to leafy alfalfa. Goats are not fond of clover pasture.
The data in tables 2 and 3 are based on research conducted at Minnesota with gestating and lactating Angora goats and with young Angora kids.
The nutrient intake values appearing in table 2 are for goats that weighed 10-20 pounds less than the goats for which values in table 1 were constructed. The hay diet and the 2:1 or 3:1 hay-corn diets were fed in different years, so a direct comparison between the diets is not intended. The data suggest that feed intake, of gestating goats as a percent of body weight, should approximate 3.2 percent when hay is the main nutrient source and 2.5 to 3.0 percent when 25 to 30 percent grain is included in the diet. It's also apparent that relatively high levels of grain can be fed gestating Angora does without adversely affecting either hair or kid production.
Table 3 contains data collected during five lactation periods that provide a picture of the response of lactating Angora does to various levels of grain feeding and the performance of does nursing twins or single kids. Three points are striking:
Table 4 contains a 3-year summary of methods of raising kids during the summer. Should they be weaned, creep feed, or fed in drylot or pasture? We have consistently noted ADG between 8 and 16 weeks to be about 50 percent as fast as ADG during the first 8 weeks. This is primarily due to nutrient intake from the milk declining faster than the nutrient intake from the creep feed increases.
Creep-fed kids nursing does literally full fed in drylot a 50 percent grain diet (2.1 lb TDN daily/doe) gain faster than weaned kids creep fed in drylot or unweaned, non-creep-fed kids grazing grass pastures (2 lb vs. .15 lb/day). However, the high cost of feeding the lactating doe in drylot makes it the least economical management practice of the three systems tested. Kids' feed intake and ADG normally increase after their first shearing in September.
Table 2. Effect of nutrition during gestation on the performance of angora does
| Items | 1982 and 1983 Hay diet |
1983 to 1984 3:1 alf. hay-corn diet |
1984 to 1987 2:1 alf. hay-corn diet |
||||||
| Days fed | 77 | 77 | 128 | ||||||
| No. does | 11 | 11 | 70 | ||||||
| Initial wt., lb | 69.5 | 69.3 | 79.9 | ||||||
| ADG, lb | .11 | .10 | .22 | ||||||
| Daily intake, lb | |||||||||
| Alfalfa hay | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | ||||||
| Corn | .09 | .48 | .81 | ||||||
| TDN | 1.14 | .99 | 1.52 | ||||||
| Protein | .35 | .24 | .31 | ||||||
| Feed, as % BW | 3.1 | 2.4 | 3.0 | ||||||
| Hair prod., 6 mos., lbs | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | ||||||
| Kidding rate, % | 100 | 100 | 128 | ||||||
| Weaning rate,% | 100 | 100 | 118 | ||||||
| Kid data | |||||||||
| No. kids | 11 | 11 | 60 | ||||||
| Birth wt., lb | 6.4 | 5.9 | 6.6 | ||||||
| Kid wt., 30 days, lbs | 18.7 | 17.8 | 17.8 | ||||||
Table 3. Effect of nutrition on the performance of lactating angora does (56 days)
| 1983 & 1984 |
1985 |
1986 |
1987 |
||||||
| 50% hay |
50% hay |
60% hay |
50% hay-corn |
70% alf. 30% corn |
1:1 hay-corn |
3:1 hay-corn |
|||
| Items | twins | singles | |||||||
| No. does | 11 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | |
| Initial wt., lb | 83.6 | 84.5 | 85.8 | 107.4 | 95.0 | 99.7 | 96.8 | 106.9 | |
| ADG, lb | .06 | .02 | -.02 | -.15 | -.06 | -.03 | -.24 | -.02 | |
| Daily intake, lb | |||||||||
| Alfalfa hay | 1.80 | 1.69 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 1.69 | 2.50 | 1.64 | 2.84 | |
| Corn-SBM | 1.94 | 1.67 | 1.39 | 2.05 | 1.69 | 1.12 | 1.64 | 1.19 | |
| TDN | 2.38 | 2.20 | 2.13 | 2.64 | 2.20 | 2.09 | 2.13 | 2.35 | |
| Protein | 49 | .48 | .46 | .46 | .42 | .47 | .37 | .53 | |
| As % of BW | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.8 | |
| Kid Data | |||||||||
| No. kids | 12 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 9 | |
| Initial wt, lb | 8.8 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 10.2 | 11.9 | 11.2 | |
| Wt. chg., lb | 20.2 | 22.0 | 17.6 | 14.7 | 18.5 | 14.5 | 26.0 | 26.0 | |
| ADG | .361 | .393 | .314 | .262 | .330 | .296 | .462 | .462 | |
| Daily intake, lb | |||||||||
| Creep feed | .11 | .10 | .9 | .05 | .10 | .17 | .21 | .15 | |
| TDN | .077 | .077 | .066 | .035 | .073 | .136 | .161 | .107 | |
| Protein | .018 | .015 | .013 | .007 | .015 | .026 | .035 | .022 | |
Table 4. Summer management of angora kids (summer of 1985, 1986 and 1987)
Table 5. Relative profitability of sheep and angora goatsa
| Sheep |
Goats |
|||
| Items | Low production, low prices |
High production, high prices |
Low production, low prices |
High production, high prices |
| Gross income/head | ||||
| Fiber | 8 lb @ $.60/lb=$4.80 | 10 lb @ $.70/lb=$7.00 | 10 lb @ $2/lb=$20.00 | 16 lb @ $2.50/lb=$40.00 |
| Offspring | 100 lb @ $.60/lb=$60.00 | 175 lb @ $.75/lb=$131.25 | 7 lb kid hair@ $6/lb=$42.00 | 10 lb kid hair@ $6/lb=$60.00 |
| Total income/head | $64.80 | $138.25 | $62.00 | $100.00 |
| Year-round feedb costs for dam and offspring |
$60.00 | $70.00 | $42.00 | $49.00 |
| Net return/female kept over feed costs |
$ 4.80 | $68.25 | $20.00 | $51.00 |
aAn incentive payment that is paid on both wool and mohair is not included in these values. Both are sizable and approximately equal (100%). The value of the kid(s) at time of second shearing is also not included. Actually, there is no established marketplace, and prices of shorn 12-month-old kids can vary from $10 to $100/head.
bA doe and her kid raised to 12 months of age (kid sheared twice) require about 70 percent as much feed as a ewe and her lambs raised to 6 months of age. Goat feed costs were calculated on that basis.
| North Central Regional Extension Publications are subject to peer review and prepared as a part of the Cooperative Extension activities of the thirteen land-grant universities of the 12 North Central States, in cooperation with the Extension Service-U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. The following states cooperated in making this publication available: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| For copies of this and other North Central Regional Extension Publications, write to: Publications Office, Cooperative Extension Service, in care of the University listed above for your state. If they do not have copies or your state is not listed above, contact the publishing state as specified. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| R. M. Jordan is an extension animal scientist-horses/sheep, Minnesota Extension Service and a professor, Department of Animal Science. | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Kenneth R. Bolen, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture. | |
| Programs and activities of the Cooperative Extension Service are available to all potential clientele without regard to race, color, sex, national origin, or handicap.
In cooperation with NCR Educational Materials Project. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Cooperative Extension Services of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Patrick J. Borich, Director of Minnesota Extension Service, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 |